论民事责任制度在文化遗产法律适用中的意义——以法律概念生成为视角  

On the Significance of the Civil Liability System Applied in the Cultural Heritage Laws:Perspective on the Genesis of a Legal Concept

作　　者：张舜玺[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第5期68-76,共9页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：《文物保护法》等规定了追究当事人民事责任的条款,但实践中该条款处于存而不用状态或存在适用不规范的问题。究其原因在于当前法律适用中仅将破坏文化遗产的行为定位为违反国家的行政管理秩序,对文化遗产法律概念的理解仅停留在文化民族主义的道德秩序层面,忽视了文化遗产作为财产的法律意义。我国早期文物立法深受法国影响,回顾并对比中法两国文化遗产法律概念生成的过程,不难发现在文化遗产从一个事实概念到法律概念的过程中,财产安全与文化秩序占有同等重要的地位。因此,在法律适用中亟待加大追究当事人民事责任的力度,并完善民事责任适用的规范性。Cultural Relics Protection Law and other regulations of the parties to pursue civil liability provisions, however, in practice, these provisions exist without the presence of applicable state or irregularities. This is because the current law applies only to destroy the cultural heritage of behavioral targeting for violation of state administrative order, and ignoring the legal significance as a cultural heritage property but understanding the concept of cultural heritage law only stay in the moral order of the level of cultural nationalism. China early heritage legislationinfluenced by French, cultural heritage produced from one concept to the fact, and the legal concept of property security and cultural order holds equal importance. Therefore, to increase the civil liability of the parties and to improve the applicable normative ofcivil liability system is in need.

关 键 词：文化遗产法律 民事责任 法律适用 概念生成 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学] D922.16[政治法律—法学]