从大理院判例到案例指导制度:法律传统的制度性转化  

From Da Li Yuan Case to Case Guidance System:Systematic Transforming of Traditional Law Resources

作　　者：乔惠全[1] 范忠信[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088 [2]杭州师范大学法学院,浙江杭州311121

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第5期85-92,共8页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：清末民初大理院判例是成文法缺失时期的特殊法律现象,当下的案例指导制度则是一种制度折中与调试。从大理院判例到案例指导制度,可视为判例传统的延续,虽然二者所处的历史情势和面临的具体问题并不相同,但二者的历史使命是同一的,都是传统法律资源的制度性转化的努力与尝试。以案例指导制度为例,可以看出法律传统的制度性转化对中国特色社会主义法治建设的无可替代的意义。Da Li Yuan （ Chinese Supreme Court） at the end of Qing Dynasty and early period of Republic of China is an unusual phenomenon in law history. The Case Guidance System is a system of compromise and adjustment. From the Chinese Supreme Court to Case Guidance System, the latter can be seen as the extension of the law tradition. Although the above two systems＇ historical background and the main fields involved and directed are different, the historical missions they bear are the same, that is, the result of effort made on systematic transforming of traditional law resources. Take the Case Guidance System as an example. We can see the irreplaceable meaning of the systematic transforming of law tradition to the construction of socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：大理院判例 案例指导制度 法律传统 制度性转化 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学] D926[历史地理—历史学] K25[历史地理—中国史]