房屋承租人先买权的对抗力及损害赔偿研究  

On the Protest Power and Damage Compensation of Lessee's Preemption Right

作　　者：李静[1] 

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法学院民商经济法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《宁夏社会科学》2015年第3期36-41,共6页NingXia Social Sciences

摘　　要：我国《合同法》对房屋承租人的先买权虽有明文规定,但对其法律属性、行使方式和效果未明确。仅有的一个条文不足以应付实践中的利益纠葛,理论界也争议不断。本文认定先买权为形成权,仅具债权性效力,对第三人不具有对抗力;出租人违反通知义务应承担债务不履行之损害赔偿责任,赔偿范围为履行利益,除第三人以违背善良风俗之手段侵害先买权外,不应承担侵权责任,但此种侵权责任的构成要件需严格,实务中更应谨慎。Although the Contract Law of our country has stipulated the housing lessee＇ s preemption right in explicit term, it doesn＇ t clarify its property, exercise mode and effect. Only one term is insufficient to cope with the practical conflicts of interests and there are constant arguments in theoretical circle. In this paper, the author holds the opinion that preemption is the right of formation only having the credit effect and it doesn ＇ t have the protest power to the third party. What ＇ s more, lessor violating notification obligation should bear the damage compensation liability for the failure to fulfill credit obligation and its scope of compensation is positive interest. However, if the third party acted against moral standards to infringe preemption right, the lessor should not assume tort liability, but to meet this kind of tort liability need very strict requisites and thus should be dealt with a more cautious attitude in practice.

关 键 词：承租人先买权 形成权 对抗力 损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]