中国运动式治理缘何发生?何以持续?——基于相关文献的述评  

Why Does Chinese Campaigning Governance Occur, and Why Does It Continue: Review on Relevant Literatures

作　　者：王连伟[1] 刘太刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学,北京100872

出　　处：《上海行政学院学报》2015年第3期106-111,共6页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute

基　　金：国家"985工程优势学科创新平台项目";中国人民大学行政管理国家重点学科专业资助项目的阶段性成果

摘　　要：运动式治理作为一种中国本土化的治理模式,具有鲜明的中国色彩。目前国内学术界对其褒贬不一。通过梳理和回顾国内外关于中国运动式治理发生和运作机理的相关文献,我们尝试回答"制度化运动悖论"问题,即中国常态社会下为何反复使用运动式治理这一非常规工具,并初步归纳出四种比较有解释力的研究途径:社会资源有限说,治理工具有限说,科层官僚制局限说和社会动员能力下降说。作为特定历史阶段的产物,运动式治理有其存在的合理性。我们在理论研究和实际运作过程中必须在坚持有限否定和类型化承认评判价值取向基础上,深入分析它的现实解释力和适用范围,结合新的情势不断创新和丰富其内涵和形式。As a Chinese localized governance model, campaigning governance has its own distinctive Chinese colors. At present, there are both positive and negative comments on it from the aeademic field. By collecting and reviewing relevant literatures of the occurring and operational mechanism of Chinese campaigning governance, we try to answer the question of ＂institutionalization movement paradox＂, that is why China repeatedly uses this unconventional campaigning governance tool under normal society. We preliminarily conclude four compara- tively explanatory research approaches： assumption of limited social resources, assumption of limited governance tools, assumption of limited hierarchical bureaneraey and assumption of declined social mobilization. As a product of specific historical stage, campaigning governance has its own reason for existence. We should deeply analyze the practical of theoretical study and practical explanatory power and scope of ap- plication and continuously innovate and enrich its content and form, based on the value orientation of limited denial and typed admittanee during the process of our theoretical research and practical operation.

关 键 词：运动式治理 社会资源有限说 治理工具有限说 科层官僚制局限说 社会动员能力下降说 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]