“边疆”与民族——略论民族区域的治理逻辑  被引量:13

“Frontier”and Minzu: On Logic of Governance in Ethnic Districts

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:范可[1,2] 

机构地区:[1]南京大学社会学院 [2]南京大学人类学研究所

出  处:《西北民族研究》2015年第2期33-43,共11页Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies

基  金:国家社科基金重点项目"公民意识与多民族国家的族别认同"(09AMZ001);"江苏省高等学校优势学科建设工程资助项目"的成果

摘  要:多民族国家都有相应的处理多民族或者多族群事务的方式,但并非所有的多民族或者多族群国家都对人口进行严格的分类识别。本研究试图借助福柯治理术的洞见来讨论我国民族政策的治理逻辑。现代治理术的核心在于如何让民众相信,政府可以通过实现其意志来满足民众的诉求。然而,就我国而言,情况似乎并非如此。主权为重中之重,这与少数民族大多居住在所谓"边疆"地区有关。中国国家的体制决定了国家是执政党的国家,在这样的理念下进行治理,"倾听"在决策过程中几乎是可遇而不可求的。如果决策者不根本改变有关执政理念,这种依据"边疆"的程度来对民族地区进行治理与控制的方式,无法给这些地区带来万象共生、和而不同的善治状态。All multinational states have their ways in dealing with multinational or multiethnic affairs, but not all of them strictly categorize population through ethnic identification. Following Michel Foueauh this study attempts to examine the logic of governance of Chinese state in the frontiers. It is argued that the presence of the Chinese state in the frontiers tends to concern more with sovereignty rather than the people' s livelihood. The core of mod- em govern- mentality is in ways as how to make people believe that government's will is realization of people's will. This, however, is not the case in China; because of concern of sovereignty governance has yielded to domina- tion in ways of power operation. It is advocated in this paper that the state should make changes in terms of power operation, putting people's livelihood priori to anything else as its governmentality, and the governor should know how to stand for ordinary people, seriously learning and listening from what they said and whys of their thinking.

关 键 词:边疆 民族 治理 治理术 管控 福柯 

分 类 号:C95[社会学—民族学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象