检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙冉冉[1]
出 处:《学理论》2014年第24期89-91,共3页Theory Research
摘 要:证人证言作为法定证据之一,在认定事实方面起着重要作用。然而在司法实践中,证人出庭率低、甚至拒绝作证等现象日益严重,已影响到人民法院审判活动的公正和顺利进行。证人出庭作证问题已成为诉讼庭审制度改革中最突出、最难以解决的问题之一。在目前的社会实际状态下,强制证人出庭作证不仅不可能提高证人出庭作证率,反而会导致证人出庭作证关系的恶化发展。从人的本性、社会环境传统、人权保障以及法理等层面对强制证人出庭作证制度展开思考,以期纠正当前一味强制证人出庭作证之风。Testimony of witness, as one of legal evidence plays an important role in asserting the fact. However,in judicial practice, The phenomenon that the rate of appearance of witnesses refuse is low and even The witnessrefuses to testify are growing that has affected the people's court of justice and judicial activities carried outsmoothly. Witnesses to testify in court has become one of the most prominent and difficult problem to solve in thereform of court system. In the author's opinion, in the current social actual conditions, forcing the witness to appearin court would not only improve the rate of appearance of witness, but will lead to the deterioration development ofthe relationship of witnesses to testify in court. This article will start thinking on the institution of compulsorytestifying from the aspects of human nature, social environment, the protection of human rights and the traditionallegal theory in order to correct the trend of compulsory testifying.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.29.119