共和国司法组织改革的宪法依托——兼及内地与特别行政区的比较  

Judicial Organization Reform in China Based on Its Constitution——Comparison between the Mainland and SARs

作　　者：谭波[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期31-36,共6页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(12CFX021);河南省高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划项目(2012GGJS-089);省属高校基本科研业务费专项资金前期研究与重大项目培育基金(2014YWQQ26);河南工业大学青年骨干教师培育计划

摘　　要：我国目前司法组织改革的宪法规制相比改革实践与形势来说稍显滞后。对比特别行政区基本法关于司法组织的规定,不难发现内地现行司法组织宪法规定的漏洞,司法组织改革是系统工程的运作,需要从定名定性、司法人员规制、司法(组织)协助外向化和自新机制打造的角度,构建司法组织改革的多重宪法依托。In China the constitutional regulation on the present judicial organization reform seems lags behind the reform practice and situation. If we compare the provisions of the judicial organization stipulated in the basic law of SARs, it is not difficult to find the loopholes in the present constitutional provisions of the judicial organization. The judicial organization reform is the operation of systematical construction. A multilevel constitution dependence should be constructed for the judicial organizational reform by confirming the name and character of the judiciary, regulating the judicial persons, making the judicial （ organization ） assistance outgoing and setting up the self - changing system.

关 键 词：司法组织 宪法 比较 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]