我国文化产业政府监管的现状、问题与完善对策  

Situation, Problems and Countermeasures of the Government's Regulatory Oversight of China's Culture Industry

作　　者：饶世权[1] 刘咏梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学政治学院,成都611756

出　　处：《出版科学》2015年第2期14-20,共7页Publishing Journal

基　　金：四川省社会科学十二五规划课题"文化产业政府监管的对策研究"(SC13XS016)研究成果

摘　　要：我国文化产业现有的"健康型"政府监管模式,是以文化产业"健康"为监管理念,以克服"不能满足公共利益"的市场失灵为监管目标,以多部门为监管主体,全过程的行政监管,以政府为动力机制,行政监管为实施机制,以行政制度为保障机制。存在监管理念和模式定位偏差,政府监管结构不科学、不合理,机制不畅通等不足。因此,应当分业监管,确立文化产业的"健康发展型"监管模式:建构科学、合理的监督结构,建构政府主导的政府与非政府组织结合动力机制和法律监管机制,强化法律制度保障机制,从而克服"不能满足公共利益"和"无效率"的市场失灵。The present govemment regulatory oversight of culture industry in China is healthy development-oriented＂, which puts a stable and sound development as a priority, aiming to avoid practice of not meeting the public interests and malfunction of the market. As a result, multiple government departments are involved in the regulatory mechanism and they practice all-in-one administrative oversight over all elements in the culture industry. The mechanism highlights the government as the authority, the administrative measures as the implementation tools and the administrative regulation as the guarantee in the process. Problems thus arise in the conflict between the management concepts and the enforcement models, such as the unscientific and unreasonable structure of the oversight mechanism and the blockade in coordination work. This paper proposes a regulation model with clarified responsibilities by an improved division of administrative powers, The purpose is to build a more scientific and reasonable regulatory structure espoused by the government watchdogs as the main regulators and the NGOs as the facilitators to give impetus and legal support to the oversight of the culture industry. A strengthened legislation will help overcome problems of not meeting the public interests and malfunction of the market

关 键 词：文化产业 政府监管模式 健康型 健康发展型 法律制度机制 监管结构 

分 类 号：G230[文化科学]