深圳医事仲裁中的调解与人民调解的比较  

To Compare the Conciliation in Medical Arbitration with the People 's Mediation in Shenzhen

作　　者：马文建[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳市龙岗区妇幼保健院,广东深圳518172

出　　处：《辽宁医学院学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期7-10,共4页Journal of Liaoning Medical College:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：仲裁程序中的调解是我国《仲裁法》所确立的一项基本制度,也是我国仲裁机构的一贯做法。在深圳医患纠纷仲裁院已受理的医事纠纷案件中,大约2/3通过调解结案,所有调解结果均顺利履行。仲裁庭选择调解结案有助于化解医患矛盾,且当事人对调解协议中确定的义务自动履行的可能性明显加大、需要借助法院强制执行的可能性缩小。通过对医事仲裁中的调解与不收任何费用的人民调解进行相同与差异性的比较得出:在新近推出的两种医患纠纷处理方式中,仲裁优于人民调解。The conciliation in arbitration proceedings is a basic system in Arbitration Law and the establishment of the arbitration institution customary practice. The doctor-patient dispute arbitration court has been accepted by the medical dispute cases in Shenzhen, about two-thirds through conciliation, mediation results are all performed smoothly. The arbitration tribunal conciliation help to defuse doctor-patient contradiction and the possibility of obligation implementation in conciliation agreement is obviously increasing, and the possibility of compulsory execution is decreasing. Through comparing the conciliation in medical arbitration with the people＇s mediation without any charge, this paper concluded that arbitration method is better than that of people＇s mediation.

关 键 词：医事仲裁 仲裁中的调解 人民调解 仲裁员 调解员 

分 类 号：R192[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]