山区型县市城镇化质量评价模型及其应用研究——以湖北省为例  

RESEARCH ON THE EVALUATION MODEL OF URBANIZATION QUALITY AND ITS APPLICATION IN MOUNTAINOUS COUNTIES: TAKING HUBEI PROVINCE AS AN EXAMPLE

作　　者：黄亚平[1] 单卓然[2] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学建筑与城市规划学院 [2]华中科技大学建筑与城市规划学院区域与城市发展研究中心

出　　处：《城市规划》2015年第4期27-34,共8页City Planning Review

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(51178200)

摘　　要：为科学系统地揭示山区型县市城镇化发展状况,研究选取湖北省26个样本,基于SPSS及主成分分析法构建并应用城镇化质量评价模型。研究发现:省域内现状城镇化质量梯度差异显著,过半样本城镇化建设负面效应居多。少数县市在特定功能层面处于领先水平,但总体不存在绝对优势样本,各县市相对优势与发展短板同样明显。研究认为:山区型县市城镇化发展面临附属依赖特大城市、空间集聚能力普遍不强、经济活跃程度差异巨大、社会保障进程显著滞后、生态低碳水平难以提升5项共性瓶颈。研究提出,现阶段城镇化质量提升应采取"融圈入群"、"集约紧凑"、"三化三业"、"重量保质"、"轻重并存、劳资结合"并举的策略,以及处于不同阶段层次的山区型县市应采取差异化提升路径。By choosing twenty-six samples from Hubei Province, the paper scientifically and systemically reveals the current development situation based on the evaluation model of urbanization quality constructed through the method of SPSS and principal component analysis. The study finds that there exist significant differences in urbanization quality among mountainous counties, and over half of them have negative effects on urbanization construction. Albeit a few counties are at an advanced level in certain aspects, overall none of them has absolute advantages. Their development advantages and disadvantages are both significant. The study observes that mountainous counties are faced with common challenges including relying too much on metropolis, poor spatial concentration ability, non-dynamic economic market, lagged social insurance, and lower ecological level. The study proposes that the current quality promotion should be integrated with strategies including to incorporate clusters into metropolis, to be compact and intensive, to value the quality while maintaining the quantity, to improve social insurance, and simultaneously to diversify industries. Different stages should follow variant paths.

关 键 词：山区型县市 城镇化质量 评价模型 湖北省 

分 类 号：F299.21[经济管理—国民经济]