检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭玲[1] 刘云[1] 韩应盛[1] 潘庆华[1] 路云环[1]
出 处:《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》2015年第4期232-233,237,共3页China Journal of Leprosy and Skin Diseases
摘 要:目的:比较红光与强脉冲激光治疗中重度痤疮的疗效。方法:将46例中重度痤疮患者分为2组,每组23例。两组患者外敷5-氨基酮戊酸(5-ALA)1h后,分别给予红光(A组)和强脉冲激光(B组)照射,每2周1次,共治疗3次,治疗结束后4周评价疗效。结果:A组和B组有效率分别为82.61%和78.26%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:红光与强脉冲激光治疗中重度痤疮的疗效相当。Objective:To compare the efficacy of red light and intense pulsed light ( IPL) with 5-amin-olevulinic acid photodynamic therapy ( 5-ALA) in the treatment of moderate to severe acne. Methods:Forty-six patients were divided into group A and group B. All patients were treated with 5-ALA. Then the patients in the group A and group B were treated with red light and IPL respectively, once every two weeks, for 3 times. The efficacy was assessed after 4 weeks of the treatment. Results: The effective rates in the group A and group B were 82.61% and 78.26%, with no significant difference between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion:Light and IPL have the equivalent efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe acne.
分 类 号:R758.733[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.113.167