检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马晓国[1]
机构地区:[1]南京工程学院经济与管理学院,江苏南京211167
出 处:《技术经济与管理研究》2015年第5期17-20,共4页Journal of Technical Economics & Management
基 金:江苏省教育厅哲学社会科学基金项目(2014SJD158);南京工程学院创新基金重大项目(CKJA201307)
摘 要:绿色建筑的推广需从投资者和社会的角度对绿色建筑项目进行科学评价。以"有无对比"的原则,对绿色建筑项目增量成本和增量效益进行全面识别和计量。通过增量财务现金流量与增量经济费用流量的对比分析,由于绿色建筑的经济外部性,财务效益不显著,单从投资者的角度对推广绿色建筑项目积极性不大。政府需依据经济分析结果进行适当的财政补贴,使其具有财务可行性。同时,由于投资者对是否开发绿色建筑项目具有选择权,使绿色建筑项目具有实物期权价值。运用实物期权法对绿色建筑项目进行科学评价,更有利于绿色建筑项目的推广。The promotion of green building requires the scientific evaluation on the green building project from the perspective of the investors and the social. The paper uses"with and without comparison"principle to recognize and measure comprehensively the incremental cost and incremental benefit of the green building project. By comparing the incremental financing cash flow and economic increment of cost flow analysis, it is found that there is no significant financial benefit viewed from the perspective of investors little enthusiasm for the promotion of green building project because of the economic externality of green building. The government should offer appropriate financial subsidies according to the economic analysis results and improve the financial feasibility. At the same time , because of the investors has the right to choose whether to develop green building project or not, the green building project has real option value. Using real option method to evaluate green building projects could be more conductive to the promotion of green building project.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117