检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连医科大学附属第一医院,大连市116011 [2]大连医科大学 [3]大连医科大学附属第二医院
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2015年第5期132-133,共2页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:比较三种不同方法在静脉肾盂造影肠道准备中的应用效果。方法:将做静脉肾盂造影检查的患者210例随机分为A组80例,B组87例,C组43例。A组为口服聚乙二醇散剂,B组口服磷酸钠盐口服液,C组磷酸钠盐溶液灌肠。结果:三组患者肠道清洁效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),肠道准备耐受度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组的耐受度效果优于其它两组,且所需费用较低。结论:磷酸钠盐口服液在肠道准备中的效果可靠,患者耐受度好,减轻了护士护理工作量及劳动强度,值得临床推广应用。Objective:To compare the effect of three different bowel preparation methods for intravenous pyelogram. Methods:210 patients of intravenous py-elogram were randomly divided into group A,B and C. Group A was took polyethylene glycol oral powder,group B sodium phosphates oral solution and group C sodium phosphate rectal solution. Results:It was not significant difference the bowel cleaning effect of three groups(P 〉 0. 05). It was significant differ-ence the the bowel preparation tolerance of three groups(P 〈 0. 05). The tolerance of group B was better than the others groups,and the costs was the low-est. Conclusion:It was reliable,tolerance and economy the effect of sodium phosphates oral solution for bowel preparation. It relieved the workload and labor intensity,and was worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145