检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》2015年第5期753-756,共4页Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171042);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(N140604007)
摘 要:通过对本科生和MBA学生分别进行跨期决策实验,估计各跨期选择模型(指数函数、简单双曲线、拟双曲线和q指数函数)的参数及拟合度AICc.同时还比较了两种测量动态不一致程度的方法.结果发现:无论实验对象是否有工作经验,使用q指数函数的贴现模型总能产生最小的AICc值,因此是最优模型;基于对数时间理论的测量方法捕获了动态不一致性的本质,是测量动态不一致性程度的最优方法.The parameters and AICc (Akaike information criterion with small sample correction) of intertemporal choice models (exponential, simple hyperbolic, quasi hyperbolic and q- exponential) for undergraduate students and MBA students were estimated respectively. Meanwhile, two methods indicating the degree of inconsistency were compared. The results showed that the q-exponential discount model always generates the minimum AICc value regardless of working experience, and it is thus regarded as the optimal discount model; the method based on the logarithmic time-perception theory captures the essence of dynamic inconsistency, and it thus serves as the optimal approach to measure the degree of dynamic inconsistency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30