检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白伟利[1] 侯瑞生 秦伟伟[1] 谢卫征[1] 孟玉霞[1]
机构地区:[1]安阳市第六人民医院神经内科,河南安阳455000 [2]河南国际旅行卫生保健中心,郑州450003
出 处:《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》2015年第5期486-487,共2页Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
摘 要:目的探讨F波及H反射测定在腰骶神经痛诊断中的价值。方法 120例腰骶神经根痛患者行神经电生理检查测定双下肢F波和H反射,比较F波与H反射的异常率,H反射波幅与潜伏期异常率。结果 240条胫神经中45条出现F波异常,异常率为18.75%;127条出现H反射异常,异常率为52.9%,F波异常率低于H反射异常率(P<0.05);H反射的波幅异常率为48.2%,明显高于潜伏期异常率(27.74%)(P<0.01)。结论 F波和H反射测定对腰骶神经根损伤的诊断有重要临床意义,其中H反射的诊断价值优于F波。Objective To explore the value of F-wave and H-reflex measurement to the diagnosis of lumbosacral nerve root pain.Methods The values of F-wave and H-reflex were recorded by electroneurophysiology in 120 patients with lumbosacral nerve root pain to compare the abnormal rate of F-wave with H-reflex,and the abnormal rate of H-reflex amplitude with H-reflex latency.Results The abnormity rate of F-wave was 18.75%in 45 of 240tibial nerves,while the abnormity rate of H-reflex was 52.9%in 127 of 240tibial nerves.The abnormal rate of F-wave was lower than H-reflex(P0.05).The abnormal rate of amplitude of H-reflex was 48.2%,significantly higher than that of H-reflex latency(27.74%)(P0.01).Conclusion F-wave and H-reflex play an important role in the diagnosis of lumbosacral nerve root injury,and H-reflex is superior to F-wave.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.172.36