检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡昭怡[1]
出 处:《中国妇幼保健》2015年第15期2331-2332,共2页Maternal and Child Health Care of China
摘 要:目的:探究临床有效治疗妊娠期糖尿病的可靠方法。方法:对84例妊娠期糖尿病患者随机分为观察组(采用门冬胰岛素诺和锐进行治疗)和对照组(采用生物合成人胰岛素诺和灵R进行治疗)各42例,观察比较两组患者临床治疗后FPG、2Hppg、Hb Alc、胰岛素用量和达标时间。结果:在FPG、2Hppg、Hb Alc、胰岛素用量、达标时间等5项指标上观察组均明显的优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);总低血糖发生率观察组显著的低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:在临床针对妊娠期糖尿病患者采用门冬胰岛素进行治疗的临床优势明显,相关患者的临床指标水平更好,不良反应发生水平更低,是临床治疗妊娠期糖尿病的理想选择。Objective: To explore the effective and reliable method for treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) . Meth- otis: Eighty-four GDM patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 42 patients in observation group were trea- ted with insulin aspart, while 42 patients in control group were treated with biosynthetic human insulin ; the levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), two-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2Hppg), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc), insulin doses, and the time of reaching the standard in the two groups were observed and compared. Results: FPG, 2Hppg, HbAlc, insulin dose and the time of reaching the standard in observation group were statistically significantly better than those in control group ( P〈0. 05 ) ; the incidence rate of hypoglycemia in obser- vation group was statistically significantly lower than that in control group (P〈0. 01 ) . Conclusion: The clinical advantages of insulin as- part in treatment of GDM patients are significant, the clinical indexes are better, the incidence rates of adverse reactions are lower, which is the ideal choice for clinical treatment of GDM.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30