麦克塔加与分析哲学学派的时间理论之争  

The Debate of Time Theory between McTaggart and Analytical Philosophers

作　　者：陈群志[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《哲学研究》2015年第5期81-87,129,共7页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：本文主要围绕麦克塔加和分析哲学学派的时间理论之争展开讨论。第一节考察了麦克塔加"时间悖论"的论证过程。首先,他区分了A系列(过去、现在、将来)和B系列(在先、在后),并指出B系列无法说明时间的本质,能够说明时间本质的只有A系列;其次,他论证了A系列不可能具有实在性,因此,时间和变化都是非实在的。在第二和第三节中,详细分析了A-理论家和B-理论家反驳"时间悖论"的诸种理由。得出的结论是:A-理论家和B-理论家都接受了麦克塔加对时间所进行的二分法处理,因而无法最终解决问题,反而产生了新的争论(A-理论与B-理论之争)。职是之故,我们初步引入了以现象学方案解决"时间悖论"的构想。This paper is centered around McTaggart's theory of time and one of the analytical philosophers.Section one examines closely McTaggart's argument of the ' time paradox'.First,McTaggart distinguishes A series time(past,present and future) and B series time(earlier and later),and points out that the B series cannot explain the nature of time,but A series can.Second,he demonstrates that A series time cannot be true of reality,and thus time and change are unreal.Section two and three then analyzes in detail the reasoning according to which ' A-' and 'B-' theorists refute the 'time paradox'.The conclusion is that 'A-' and 'B-' theorists have accepted the dichotomization of two aspects of time,and therefore cannot resolve the paradox,but also caused a new argument(between A-theory and B-theory).Finally,it is preliminarily introduced the conception that Husserl's phenomenology may solve the 'time paradox'.

关 键 词：麦克塔加 时间哲学 时间悖论 分析哲学 现象学 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]