检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学,上海200032
出 处:《中国卫生事业管理》2015年第5期363-366,共4页Chinese Health Service Management
摘 要:目的:在新医改和城镇化的持续推进下,基于健康公平理论和卫生筹资公平性,研究实施城乡居民医保一体化对财政筹资负担的影响情况,为提高城乡卫生筹资与健康公平性提供参考意见。方法:收集相关文献,比较北京市城乡居民医疗筹资差别,分析相关数据,研究实施城乡居民医保一体化筹资对财政筹资负担如何。结果:人均筹资水平不变,人均缴费98.2元,低于城镇居民基本医疗保险和新农合人均缴费水平,个人和财政均能承受筹资负担(方案1)。适当提高筹资标准,合理规划筹资结构,不会严重增加财政负担(方案5)。结论:通过对比北京市城乡医保筹资情况,一体化筹资确有一定的必要性和有利性,做好制度设计,合理筹资可保证筹资的安全可持续性。Objective To study the influence of integration of urban basic medical insurance system (URBMI) and rural new cooperative medical system (NCMS) on the burden on financing, and provide references for improving the equity of health and health financing. Methods Related literatures were collected to comparatively study the differences of financing. Results The per ca- pita financing kept unchanged, which was bearable and lower than the average financing of URBMI and NCMS. Limited increase in financing standard will not significantly increase the financial burden. Conclusion It is necessary and beneficial to implement inte- gration of financing,which needs to be rationally designed to ensure its safety and sustainability.
关 键 词:城乡一体化 财政筹资 城镇居民基本医疗保险 新型农村合作医疗
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145