检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘文武[1] 季春华[1] 鲜林峰 唐光明[1] 徐伟刚[1]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学海军医学系潜水医学教研室,上海200433
出 处:《军事医学》2015年第4期319-320,F0003,共3页Military Medical Sciences
基 金:第二军医大学校级课题资助项目(2014JS18)
摘 要:海洋资源开发和军事作业中,常常需要在超出空气潜水允许的深度采用氦氧混合气进行常规潜水作业。目前,许多国家针对氦氧常规潜水制定了本国的减压表,比较著名的是美国海军和法国Comex公司减压表。我国早期先后引进了前苏联减压表和Comex减压表,随后对这些表进行修订,制定了我国的两种减压表。该文对5种氦氧常规潜水减压表进行比较和分析,为继续优化和新研制安全、高效的减压表进行积累,满足深潜水作业的迫切需求。To meet the requirements for the development of marine resources and military operations, divers usually dive deeper than the depth at which narcosis is present during air diving. Under this condition, heliox is required for this diving. Sofar, some countries have developed their own decompression tables for routine heliox diving. The best-known is tables from USA and France. In the preceding century, tables of Former Soviet Union and France used for routine heliox diving were introduced into China. On the basis of both types of tables, Chinese Navy developed their own tables for this purpose. In this paper, we summarized the characteristics of these tables from 5 countries and compared them in terms of structure, oxygen use, total decompression time, first stop and other features. This may provide a basis for future modification of tables used in China and the development of new tables for routine heliox diving.
分 类 号:R84[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229