检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵民[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学,上海200240
出 处:《当代外语研究》2015年第4期23-28,77,共6页Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
摘 要:社论的结尾往往用来表明社论观点,是社论的关键。社论结尾如何表达观点以达到引导舆论和影响受众的目的,至关重要。我们运用评价系统中的介入子系统分析了《纽约时报》和《洛杉矶时报》社论结尾的介入资源。经分析发现,两家报纸在社论结尾使用的介入方式存在差异。最后我们探讨了这些差异对实现社论目的的影响。Generally speaking,conclusions as the key elements of editorials are where the opinions are given.Thus,how the opinions are voiced in the conclusions constitutes great importance.This paper proposes that the Engagement Systems as the sub-systems of Appraisal can be employed to analyze the conclusions of editorials so as to reveal that different ways of presenting opinions exert substantial influence on realizing editorials' goals.The present paper selects 10 English editorials from New York Times and Los Angeles Times respectively and conducts an analysis of their Engagement resources,on the basis of which,a discussion is made on how the Engagement systems exercise influence on realizing editorials' goals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249