高、低频超声联合检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的临床价值  

CLINICAL VALUE OF HIGH AND LOW FREQUENCY UNITED ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE APPENDICITIS

作　　者：萍萍[1] 赵国君[2] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古医科大学附属医院超声科,内蒙古呼和浩特010050 [2]包头市第四医院

出　　处：《内蒙古医科大学学报》2015年第2期113-116,121,共5页Journal of Inner Mongolia Medical University

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(81260224)

摘　　要：目的:探讨高频联合低频超声在临床上诊断急性阑尾炎的实用价值。方法:回顾性分析164例经临床或外科手术病理证实的急性阑尾炎的超声资料。结果:低频超声急性阑尾炎诊断符合率51.83%(85/164例),高频超声急性阑尾炎诊断符合率83.54%(137/164例),低频联合高频超声急性阑尾炎诊断符合率95.12%(156/164例)。三种检查方式两两间比较有显著性差异(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论:高频超声检查阑尾显示率高,能够清晰地显示阑尾直径、阑尾壁及阑尾腔内的情况,明确急性阑尾炎的临床类型。与腹部低频探头联合扫查,对急性阑尾炎及其周围组织关系的诊断具有很高的临床实用价值,为临床及时有效的治疗提供强大的影像学支持与帮助。Objective： To explore the practical value of the high frequency ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Methods： The ultrasonographic findings of 180 cases of acute appendicitis confirmed by surgery and pathology or by medical treatment were retrospective analyzing. Results： Low frequency ultrasound diagnosed 85 cases of appendicitis. In line with rates of 51. 83%. High frequency ultrasound diagnosed 137 cases of appendicitis. In line with rates of 83. 54%. low frequency ultrasound combined with high frequency ultrasound diagnosed 156 cases of appendicitis,in line with rates of95. 12%. To compare three examination way have notable difference. Conclusions： To unite high and low frequency ultrasound can improve the application of ultrasonic diagnosis of acute appendicitis the rate determined for the clinical treatment programs provide important diagnostic evidence,has important clinical significance in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

关 键 词：超声 联合 阑尾炎 

分 类 号：R391.4[医药卫生—基础医学]