检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李敢[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学公共管理学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《南京财经大学学报》2015年第2期1-6,共6页Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
基 金:浙江省社会科学界联合会研究课题成果;课题号2014N100;浙江工商大学公共管理学院行政管理重点学科建设经费资助;课题号1150XJ3514003
摘 要:价值增值链理论运用于工业地理的产业升级研究已经颇为丰富,但是,这一理论在文化产业集群方面适用性尚有待于补充完善,例如,在象征意义浓厚的工艺美术品市场,是否存在传统产业集群优势分析中尚未涉及到问题,如果存在,则其有哪些体现,等等。基于对浙江浦江和江苏东海水晶产业集群的比较分析,试图探究价值增值链分析视角下两类水晶产业集群的升级路径及其所产生的社会—经济效应。Application of value added chain theory on general industrial upgrading has been quite rich. However, the ap- plication in terms of cultural industry cluster is still yet to be perfected, for example, in the field of arts and crafts market, which is strong symbolism, the issue has not been involved well. Whether there are some difference between the two kinds of industry clusters considering the application of value added chain theory on industrial upgrading or not. If they are and what are they. Based on the cases between Pujiang County and Donghai County, the paper aims at a comparative analysis of the value added chain on the upgrading paths of Crystal clusters.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120