检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘军[1]
出 处:《法学论坛》2015年第3期119-126,共8页Legal Forum
基 金:中国博士后科学基金一等面上资助项目<经验性该当与罪刑均衡的实现>(2014M550130);山东省法学会课题<该当与危险:新型刑罚目的对量刑的影响>(SLS2014G5)的研究成果
摘 要:我国《刑法》规定的减轻处罚量刑情节在立法上存在诸多弊端,减轻处罚适用原则遇到了难以克服的司法困境,大陆法系国家或地区刑法规定的量刑过程一般包括选择刑罚幅度、形成处断刑、决定宣告刑三大阶段。加入了处断刑环节的量刑,是一个从一般到特殊再到个别的过程,符合基本的思维规律与习惯,并能够很好地处理量刑情节的竞合等问题,具有独特的优势。我国《刑法》有必要考虑借鉴域外立法模式,考虑增加处断刑的阶段,以完善量刑过程、缜密量刑思维。The sentencing circumstances of mitigated punishment regulated in China criminal law have lots of maladies in legisla- tion, and the principle of mitigated punishment is faced with a judicial plight formidable. The sentencing process under continen- tal law system generally includes selecting penalty range, forming application penalty, and deciding the sentence of penalty three stages. Adding the process of application penalty is a process from general to particular and then individual, and this would ac- cord with the basic thinking patterns and habits and contribute more on solving the problem of concurrence circumstances of sen- tencing, so the process of application penalty has its unique advantage. To improve the sentencing process of China criminal law and form one kind of more thorough sentencing thinking pattern, it' s necessary to use extraterritorial legislative mode for refer- ence and add the process of application penalty in sentencing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13