检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《物流技术》2015年第9期235-237,241,共4页Logistics Technology
摘 要:在Nash协商的利益分配基础上,在风险程度、投入水平、经济效益、环境效益、努力水平、技术创新等各个因素影响下,研究了绿色供应链系统利益分配。建立了基于不对称Nash协商利益分配模型和基于满意度Nash协商利益分配模型,并应用实际算例对两种分配模型进行对比研究。最后得出基于满意度Nash协商利益分配模型是绿色供应链系统更为合理的利益分配模式,它使供应链系统能够稳健地发展,并能够更加有效地调动供应链系统参与者的积极性。In this paper, based on the Nash negotiation mechanism in benefit allocation and upon considering such factors as risk extent, investment level, economic benefit, environment benefit, effort level, and technical innovation, etc., we studied the benefit allocation mechanism of a green supply chain system, established a benefit allocation model based on the asymmetrical Nash negotiation mechanism and another one based on customer satisfaction and then through a comparison of the two models, demonstrated that the Nash negotiation benefit allocation model based on customer satisfaction was more suitable for the green supply chain system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117