民法中恢复原状类型与规范意义  

Types of Restitution And the Significance of Standardization In the Civil Law

作　　者：胡卫[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学,上海200438

出　　处：《行政与法》2015年第5期114-123,共10页Administration and Law

基　　金：贵州大学重点学科特色学科重大项目"交往行为理论与民法解释范式创新研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号:GDZT20120009

摘　　要：民法上的恢复原状有赔偿型恢复原状、利益型恢复原状与妨害排除型恢复原状之分。恢复原状的规范意义有作为损害赔偿标准的恢复原状和作为责任承担方式的恢复原状双重含义。不同立法例下恢复原状责任方式的规范配置有别,法律构造大异其趣。我国侵权责任法采金钱赔偿为主,对恢复原状采兼容思路,其规范意义和制度设计与传统民法有较大差别。Restitution in the civil law,Can be divided into several categories,Including Compensation type, Interest type, and Removal of interference type.The significance of standardization of restitution has two meanings,As the damage compensation standard of restitution and The way to bear liability of restitution.The Standard configuration and legal structure of restitution are greatly different in different legislative cases.The parties can choose Restitution or/and Com- pensation for losses in Chinese tort liability law.The significance of standardization and system design have great differ- ence with the traditional civil law.

关 键 词：损害赔偿 恢复原状 责任方式 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]