我国知识产权间接侵权制度的立法构造——兼论知识产权间接侵权与多数人侵权的差异  

Legislative Structure of Indirect Infringement System of China's Intellectual Property—— Also on the Difference Between Indirect Infringement of Intellectual Property and Multiple Tortfeasors

作　　者：王国柱[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期295-299,305,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(118ZD076);国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(13AFX015);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2014BS002)

摘　　要：知识产权间接侵权制度的"目标导向"与多数人侵权制度的"意思导向"存在着根本区别,多数人侵权制度无法替代间接侵权制度,有必要对知识产权间接侵权进行法定化。我国关于知识产权间接侵权的立法虽有亮点,但总体上存在缺陷。应当在知识产权单行法中分别设立间接侵权规则,对知识产权间接侵权进行类型化和体系化的规定,并对知识产权间接侵权与多数人侵权进行制度协调,进而对我国知识产权间接侵权制度进行立法完善。There is a fundamental difference between the ＂goal onentatlon＇＂ ot indirect infringement of intellectual property and the ＂meaning orientation＂ of multiple tortfeasors. Since the indirect infringement of intellectual property could not be replaced by multiple tortfeasors, it is necessary to enact the legalization of indirect infringement of intellectual property. Although there are strengths in China＇s legalization of indirect infringement of intellectual property, weaknesses do exist as a whole. The rules of indirect infringement of intellectual property should be set up respectively in the slip laws of intellectual property, the rules of indirect infringement of intellectual property should be categorized and systematized, and the indirect infringement system of intellectual property and multiple tortfeasors should be coordinated so as to perfect the legalization of indirect infringement of intellectual property in China.

关 键 词：知识产权 间接侵权 直接侵权 多数人侵权 共同侵权 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]