“普利策戏剧奖模式”及其启示  

The “Pulitzer Drama Formula” and Its Revelation

作　　者：许诗焱[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学外国语学院

出　　处：《当代外国文学》2015年第2期33-38,共6页Contemporary Foreign Literature

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学青年项目"21世纪普利策戏剧奖研究"(12YJCZH236);2013年度江苏省社科基金青年项目"21世纪普利策戏剧奖与当代美国戏剧主流研究"(13WWC010);2013年度"江苏省博士后科研资助计划"(1302046C)的阶段性成果和"江苏高校优势学科建设工程二期项目"(20140901)的研究成果

摘　　要：作为美国最有影响力的戏剧奖项,普利策戏剧奖的评奖标准一直是人们关注的话题。美国著名戏剧专家、普利策戏剧奖评委大卫·萨夫兰教授来华讲学时,将普利策戏剧奖评奖标准概括为"普利策戏剧奖模式",模式所包含的三个因素分别对应戏剧作品、剧作家和评奖机制。本文以萨夫兰教授所提出的"普利策戏剧奖模式"为线索,结合笔者目前所从事的21世纪普利策戏剧奖研究,分析这一模式在普利策获奖剧作中的体现,并探讨它对于中国戏剧评奖的启示。The evaluation criteria of the Pulitzer Prize in Drama nave continuously been subjected to heated debates in the U.S. When David Savran, a renowned scholar in American drama and two-time juror for the Pulitzer Prize in Drama, lectured in China in 2014, he described the “Pulitzer Drama Formula” as composed of three criteria, respectively concerning the play, the playwright and the evaluating mechanism. This paper tests Savran＇s “Pulitzer Drama Formula” with contemporary American plays, reaching the conclusion that the Formula has functioned in the selection of Pulitzer Prize winners since 2000. This study also intends to shed some new light on the future of drama prizes in China.

关 键 词：普利策戏剧奖 评奖标准 21世纪美国戏剧 

分 类 号：I712.073[文学—其他各国文学]