检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈彤[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆师范大学中亚与中国西北边疆政治经济研究中心,新疆乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第2期50-56,共7页Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:新疆师范大学中亚研究院特别委托项目"哈萨克斯坦;吉尔吉斯斯坦法律文本的翻译与解读研究"(XJNUZY201203)的阶段性成果
摘 要:中国与哈萨克斯坦矿产资源立法的差异性是两国矿业合作的法律壁垒与制度阻却,而矿产资源权属取得及变更的法律制度设计则同为两国矿业法制的核心与基础。通过对两国矿产资源法律权属的对比研究,可见两国在矿产资源权属取得制度、矿产资源担保物权制度及矿产资源权属变更和权利终止制度三个主要层面上异同并存,且哈萨克斯坦法律的相关规定对弥补我国矿业法制的缺漏与不足亦有一定的借鉴意义。The gap between China and Kazakhstan in ore-resource legislature is a barrier of law and system in miningindustry cooperation between the two countries while legal- system design in obtaining and changing ore-resource right serves as a core and base for the legal system of mining industry in the two countries.Through a comparative study in law on oreresource right, similarity and dissimilarity coexist obviously in the three dimensions of systems in obtaining ore-resource ownership,real rights granted by way of security in ore resource, changing and terminating ore-resource ownership between the two countries. Besides,the relevant laws and rules in Kazakhstan bears positive significance in making up for inadequate legal system in China's mining industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7