检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏方元[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073 [2]广西师范大学法学院,广西桂林541004
出 处:《中国土地科学》2015年第3期32-38,共7页China Land Science
摘 要:研究目的:分析中国农村承包土地经营纠纷仲裁制度存在的问题,提出完善中国农村土地承包经营纠纷仲裁制度的修法思路。研究方法:逻辑分析和规范分析。研究结果:中国现行农村土地承包经营纠纷仲裁制度有着浓厚的行政化、诉讼化的色彩,单方启动、强制管辖、一裁非终局等特点也有悖仲裁法的基本原则。农村土地承包经营纠纷仲裁的案件分流功能未能实现。研究结论:完善农村土地承包经营纠纷仲裁制度首先应当明确该制度的法律属性,在此基础上实现去行政化和去诉讼化的改造,实现与民事诉讼的合理对接。The purpose of this study is to analyze some problems of the arbitration system on rural land contract disputes and to bring forward proposals for perfecting it in China. Methods employed include logical analysis and normative analysis. The results of this study show that the arbitration system on rural land contract disputes has degenerates into the administrative arbitration system, and the arbitration procedure has been designed as the same as the litigation procedure. Furthermore, the arbitration system on rural land contract disputes runs without the arbitration agreement, the principle of party autonomy, and the final ruling system. Meanwhile, the function of the arbitration system on rural land contract disputes that is used to shunt the cases has failed. The paper concludes that the nature of the arbitration system on rural land contract disputes should be confirmed at firstly, and then reforms this arbitration system to docking with the civil litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248