法律不确定性命题的司法检视  

Judicial Examination of the Proposition of Law Uncertainty

作　　者：张玉洁[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学威海法学院,山东威海264209

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2015年第3期11-19,共9页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科项目"法律冲突的适用方法研究"(11CFX074)

摘　　要：伴随着法律的"语言学转向",法律的不确定性命题重又成为各法学流派争相探讨的理论热点。其理论层面上的论争在哈特与德沃金的论战以及恩蒂科特的批判中展开,并将这一命题推行至司法领域,引发了不确定命题与裁判命题的论争;而实践层面的不确定性命题则将案件梯度构造理论、司法三段论、解释理论以及裁判难题并行讨论,验证了法律不确定性命题的普适性。但是,法律的不确定性并不构成法治的必然缺陷。在法治时代,个案可供理论以及确定性命题将为法官摆脱不确定性命题的桎梏提供有效的缓解策略。With the studies of law ＂ turning to the linguistics＂, the proposition of law uncertainty again becomes one of the controversial issue of various legal schools. On the theoretical level, the proposition started from the debate between Hart and Dworkin and Endicott＇s criticism. Then it was pushed into the judicial field and caused the argument between un- certainty and judgment. On the practical level, it triggered the discussion among case gradient structure theory, judicial syllogism, interpretive theory and the judgment difficulty and the discussion verified the universality of the law uncertainty. However, law uncertainty does not mean it is the inevitable defect of law. In the rule of law, the individual - case - availa- ble theory and the certainty proposition will provide the judge effective mitigation strategies to get rid of the constraint of law uncertainty.

关 键 词：不确定性 裁判难题 疑难案件 法治 

分 类 号：DF0-051[政治法律—法学理论]