国家自然科学基金同行评议要素的多角度探索分析  

Multi-angle Explorative Analysis of NSFC Peer Review Evaluative Factors

作　　者：姚丽波[1] 钟梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国医学科学院肿瘤医院,北京,100021

出　　处：《中华医学科研管理杂志》2015年第2期160-163,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management

摘　　要：目的 探索分析国家自然科学基金同行评议要素对课题评审的影响.方法 基于国家自然科学基金同行评议专家反馈意见,统计10个评议要素申请中存在问题的百分比、专家关注的百分比和对中标的影响程度.结果 10个评议要素可分为4个组群：“核心要素”包括“研究内容”和“创新性”;“影响要素”包括“立项依据”、“经费预算”和“申请书撰写”;“基础要素”包括“科学意义及应用前景”和“研究基础”;“一般要素”,包括“申请者资质”、“研究团队”和“实验条件”.结论 从不同角度分析、考量评议要素可以帮助申请者和科研管理人员对症解决以提高国家自然科学基金的申报课题质量.Objective To analyze the factors that affecting peer review evaluation for National Science Foundation of China （NSFC） award application.Methods Base on the feedback of NSFC peer review experts,total 10 evaluation factors were extracted for analysis.The percentage of common problem and in application,and percentage of key criteriaconcerned by reviewers,and their effect on funding situation were analyzed.Results 10 evaluatiion factors were divided into 4 groups：core factors including research content and innovation;factors including hypothesis,budget and writing,basic factors including the significance of research and previous study,general factors including experience and capacity of applicants,research team and laboratory condition.Conclusions Analysis and evaluate of peer review factors from different angle may help applicants and administrators to improve the quality of NSFC application and evaluation.

关 键 词：国家自然科学基金 反馈意见分析 评议要素 

分 类 号：R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]