检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学社会学系,陕西西安710049 [2]中山大学社会学系,广东广州510006
出 处:《华东理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第2期1-14,共14页Journal of East China University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:改革开放前,住房是社会主义国家再分配的一个核心体现。随着中国市场化改革的推进,住房不平等受到了越来越多的关注。基于中国2010年人口普查汇总数据和2010年中国社会综合调查数据的分析,本文获得对当前住房不平等如下几点认识:(1)农村住户人均住房建筑面积稍高于城市住户;(2)城市地区的住房设施,用以测量住房质量的指标,远高于农村地区;(3)普查汇总数据表明教育程度和职业类别对住房不平等有着重要影响;(4)调查数据表明,单位作用在住房中弱化,但是教育程度、户口、干部身份对住房面积有着显著影响。这些结果表明了当前中国住房不平等是一个混合机制在发挥作用,包括市场和非市场混合机制共同维护了社会主义再分配制度的延续和断裂。While housing was a central measure of state socialist redistribution before China's reform and opening-up policy, it is now a focal point of attention to rising inequalities in the Chinese economy. Based on the aggregate data of China's 2010 census and the 2010 CGSS data, this paper provides both a review of current scholarship and an empirical analysis of housing inequality in the first decade of 21st century China. The main results of analysis are as follows: (1) Per capita living space is a little larger in rural areas than in urban areas; (2) Housing facilities, used to measure housing quality, are much better in urban households than their rural counterparts; (3) in both rural and urban areas there is an aggregate effect of education and occupation types on housing quality and inequality measures; (4) 2010CGSS data indicates that education levels, hukou, and political power still play significant roles in household's housing areas. These results suggest that housing inequalities in China today are a mixed system, in which market and nonmarket mechanisms coexist to contribute to the continuality and discontinuity of the socialist redistributive institution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33