检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029
出 处:《湖南中医药大学学报》2015年第4期30-32,共3页Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
基 金:北京中医药文化研究基地
摘 要:本文通过《千金要方》宋校本与《新雕孙真人千金方》的对校研究,发现宋人整理《千金要方》时增补了大量新文献,其中有些与宋校《重广补注〈黄帝内经素问〉》、《金匮要略方论》、《脉经》、《针灸甲乙经》等书中的相关内容相合,推断宋人校订这5本医书的时间虽异,但其内容是相互关联的,推测是宋人搜集了大量相关文献资料,用以修订、补充其所校之医书,此为考察宋人整理中医古籍的原则与方法提供一定的参考。This paper compares the two versions of Qianjin Yaofang (the one edited by Song scholars and the one did not edited by them), and Xindiao Sunzhengren Qianjin Yaofang, we find out that scholars in Song Dynasty added a large quantity of new literatures when they edited Qianjin Yaofang. Some of these new literatures are basically in line with the according contents of Huangdi Neijing Suwen (Chongguang Buzhu), Jinkui Yaolue Fanglun, Maijing, Zhenjiu Jiayi Jing. The editions made by Song scholars of these six books are connected to each other despite that they were made at different time. It is very probable that Song scholars collected a large volume of relevant literatures to perfect all the ancient medical books they edited. This will provide references for the study on the principles and methods employed by Song scholars to edit the Chinese medical books.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145