检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李娣[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院,北京100038
出 处:《现代预防医学》2015年第11期2040-2041,共2页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨两种不同的破伤风抗毒素皮试液配制方法在临床中的应用情况。方法 1 205例接受TAT注射的患者,其中,男性770例,女性435例,随机分配入实验组或对照组。结果对照组602例,阳性者为182例,阳性率为30.2%,实验组603例,阳性者为47例,阳性率为7.8%,P<0.05。结论实验组方法可明显降低TAT皮试结果阳性率,增加患者用药机会。Objective To probe into two different ways of dispensing the skin test of tetanus antitoxin. Methods A total of 1205 patients with subcutaneous injection of tetanus antitoxin (770 men and 435 women) were randomly divided into the experimental group and control group. Results There were 602 patients in control group with 182 positive, with a positive rate of 30.2%, while 603 patients in experimental group with 47 positive, with a positive rate of 7.8%. We found there was a significant difference between the experimental group and control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The method of experimental group could significantly reduce the positive rate of skin test of tetanus antitoxin.
分 类 号:R118[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.31.104