检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王伟
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学法学院
出 处:《北方法学》2015年第3期35-42,共8页Northern Legal Science
基 金:哈尔滨工业大学人文社会科学研究资助计划项目"金融服务者缔约说明义务研究";中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(项目编号HIT.HSS.201402)的研究成果
摘 要:义务乃责任之基础,责任为义务履行之法律保障。金融服务者违反缔约说明义务亦应承担法律责任。金融商品交易的本质决定了私法责任的核心地位,而我国现行立法却无法为金融服务者违反缔约说明义务私法责任提供理想的请求权基础。基于金融服务者与金融消费者地位极端不平等的现实,应当确立向弱势群体倾斜保护的特殊侵权责任。特殊侵权责任由无过错责任原则与举证责任倒置规则构成,对违法行为、因果关系以及损害赔偿额实行推定,以实现对金融消费者的救济。Obligation is the foundation of liability while liability is the security for performance of obliga- tion. Accordingly, in violation of obligation of explanation for contracting, the financial service provider should assume liability as well. The essence of transaction for financial products decides for the core status of liability in private law. While the ideal grounds for compensation claim is lacking in current legislations. Since the sta- tus of financial consumers is remarkable unequal with that of financial service providers, the vulnerable group should be protected with priority by special tortious liability consisting of no - fault liability and burden of proof shifting. Besides, the violation conduct, the causation and amount for compensation should be constructive so as to make remedies for financial consumers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44