检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽省安庆市第一人民医院麻醉科,246200
出 处:《安徽医学》2015年第5期589-591,共3页Anhui Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨神经刺激仪定位用于老年桡骨骨折患者行肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞麻醉效果。方法选择行肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞老年桡骨骨折患者100例,随机分为S组(50例)和P组(50例),分别在神经刺激仪和传统异感法定位下予罗哌卡因行神经阻滞,比较两组患者麻醉效果及满意度。结果 S组操作,臂丛感觉神经阻滞起效、完善及运动神经阻滞起效时间均短于P组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);S组麻醉满意度优于P组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论神经刺激仪定位应用于老年患者行肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞,安全有效。Objective To investigate the anesthetic effect of nerve stimulator method on patients with interscalene brachial plexus block in the elderly fracture of radius. Methods One hundred patients with elective upper limb operation of intermuscular groove brachial plexus block were chosen and randomly divided into 2 groups (n=50) including group S and group P. The patients in group S were treated with nerve stimulator interscalene brachial plexus block and those in group P with traditional paresthesia positioning method all by ropiva-caine. The the anesthetic effects and satisfaction of two groups were compared. Results The operation time, onset time and improving time of sensory nerve block of brachial plexus and the onset time of motor nerve block of brachial plexus of group S were significant shorter than those of group P. The anesthetic effects and satisfaction of group S were significantly better than those of group P. Conclusion The nerve stimulator can be safely and effectively applied in elderly patients with interscalene brachial plexus block.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.70.17