产品瑕疵之侵权规制与合同规制的博弈与互动  

The Game and Interaction between Tort Regulations and Contract Regulations of the Product Flaws

作　　者：杨惟钦 

机构地区：[1]云南大学法学院,云南昆明650091

出　　处：《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期44-49,共6页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(西部和边疆地区项目)"财产性利益之侵权救济控制研究"(10XJC820007)

摘　　要：产品瑕疵包括制造瑕疵、设计瑕疵与说明及警示瑕疵,而制造瑕疵应是由生产者最终负责的瑕疵类别。但传统的观念认为,产品瑕疵引发的价值量减损仅仅是一种期待利益受损,因此应由合同法进行规制,而合同责任又受限于相对性原则。因此,在特定情形下造成了受害人求偿无门的不公平现象。为实现实质正义,在产品瑕疵领域应有条件地承认侵权法与合同法规范机能划分的调整及合同相对性原则的适当突破,以实现合理范围内对受害人的救济。The product flaws refer to the flaws of the manufacture,the designs,the illustration and the warn-ing.And the producer should be ultimately responsible for the manufacture flaws of the products.According to the traditional ideas,however,the value mitigation caused by the product flaws merely belongs to the damage caused by the customers’expectation interest,and it should be regulated by Contract Law.But the contract lia-bility is limited to the principle of contract relativity,and consequently in some special conditions,victims cannot manage to seek for compensation,which is unfair.To achieve substantive justice and the relief to victims within a reasonable range,the conditional recognition should be adopted that we should adjust the function’s division in the law of torts and contract,and properly break through the principle of contract relativity.

关 键 词：产品瑕疵 侵权规制 合同规制 期待利益 互动思考 

分 类 号：DF525[政治法律—民商法学]