网络交易平台提供商专利侵权法律责任  

The Patent Infringement Liability of Internet Trading Platform Providers

作　　者：许谅亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家知识产权局

出　　处：《科技与法律》2015年第3期488-521,共34页Science Technology and Law

基　　金：北京大学国际知识产权研究中心易继明研究员主持的国家知识产权局2014年重大项目"中国特色专利制度优化路径研究"项目之子课题项目成果

摘　　要：互联网技术的普及和迅速发展,促进了网络交易的迅猛增长,也带来了一系列知识产权保护方面的问题。以专利为例,由于现行法律法规关于网络交易中专利权保护的规定不够完善,网络交易专利纠纷不断增多。梳理和明确网络交易平台提供商专利侵权法律责任,提出相应的法律修改建议,对于网络交易市场持续健康发展意义重大。近年来,网络交易平台专利侵权纠纷呈现四方面特点:一是专利纠纷数量居高不下,网络交易平台提供商处理压力极大;二是网络交易平台专利侵权认定难,网络交易平台提供商不具有认定主体资格;三是针对外观设计和实用新型专利的恶意投诉问题突出;四是网络交易平台提供商的法律责任不明。针对这些问题,建议将"通知"规则作为判断网络交易平台提供商专利侵权责任的一般原则,将"知道"规则作为判断网络交易平台提供商专利侵权责任的特殊原则,并对二者的适用条件进行区分。With the development of the internet technology,online transactions have been growing rapidly.However,new problems and new challenges are coming at the same time.Take the patent for example,due to the lack of relevant laws and regulations of intellectual property,the number of patent infringement is increasing continuously.Under this background,it is very important to comb and determine the patent infringement liability of Internet Trading Platform Providers(ITPP) ahead for promoting the sustained and healthy development of online transactions.In recent years,there are four main features in patent infringement of Internet Trading Platform.Firstly,ITPP are under pressure to handle a large number of patent disputes.Secondly,it is very difficult to determine patent infringement liability and ITPP don't have a subject qualification to determine.Thirdly there are a lot of malicious complaints about design and utility model patents.Finally,patent infringement liability of ITPP is not clear.Aiming at above problems,this dissertation gives some suggestions to perfect the laws and regulations including using the 'Notice' rules as the general liability principles and the 'Know' rules as the special liability principles,and distinguishing the applicable conditions of them.

关 键 词：网络交易平台提供商 专利侵权 “通知”规则 “知道”规则 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]