探析内服外贴法用于支气管哮喘的疗效观察  

Analysis of Effect of Internal and External Administration on Bronchial Asthma

作　　者：凌小浩[1] 陈少藩[1] 卢育明[1] 黄振炎[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省中山市中医院,广东中山528400

出　　处：《中医临床研究》2015年第12期25-26,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:总结内服外贴法用于支气管哮喘的效果,寻找适合支气管哮喘病人的最佳治疗方案。方法:本次研究资料选取2013年11月—2014年11月期间在本院进行诊治的64例支气管哮喘病人,以随机法将其划分成两个小组,即实验组与对照组。其中,32例对照组研究对象接受茶碱缓释片加布地奈德吸入剂治疗,同时32例实验组研究对象接受内服外贴法,对比并且分析两组病人中医证候的积分、一秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量的比值、ACT分数等临床信息。结果:研究结果表明,治疗之后两组研究对象在一秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量的比值、ACT分数、中医证候的积分等方面都有所改善,比较差异较为显著(P<0.05)。同时,治疗之后两组病人之间的比较未表现出明显性区别(P>0.05)。结论:临床上内服外贴法用于支气管哮喘的效果十分突出,建议推广。objective To summarize the effect of internal and external administration on bronchial asthma, so as to find the besttherapy for bronchial asthma patients. Methods： 64 patients with bronchial asthma who received treatment in our hospital from November2013 to November 2014 were randomly divided into two groups： the experimental group and the control group. 32 patients in the controlgroup were given theophylline zyban and budesonide inhalation. 32 patients in the experimental group were given internal and externaladministration. The clinical information such as TCM syndrome score, ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vitalcapacity and ACT score of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results： After treatment, the forced expiratory volume in onesecond and the ratio of forced vital capacity, ACT scores and TCM syndrome score of the two groups all improved The difference wasstatistically significant （P〈0.05）. At the same time, the comparison between the two groups after treatment showed no significantdifference （P〉0.05）. Conclusion： The clinical effect of internal and external administration for bronchial asthma is very outstanding. It canbe promoted.

关 键 词：内服外贴法 支气管哮喘 效果 茶碱缓释片 布地奈德吸入剂 

分 类 号：R245.12[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]