检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]兰州军区兰州总医院473临床部护理部,兰州市730070
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2015年第6期762-765,共4页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:兰州军区医药卫生科研计划项目(CLZ14JB25)
摘 要:目的建立一套规范、合理及操作性强的封闭式负压引流(VSD)护理技术考核评价内容。方法采用文献回顾、VSD治疗患者的临床调研、专家访谈的方法,初步拟订VSD护理技术考核评价内容。结果专家咨询的权威程度系数为0.925,判断系数为0.905,熟悉系数为0.945;最终确定VSD护理技术考核评价内容包括Ⅰ级指标4条、Ⅱ级指标27条,Ⅰ、Ⅱ级指标的协调系数分别为0.503、0.422,P<0.01,协调系数比较具有统计学意义。结论本研究构建的VSD护理技术考核评价内容能规范并指导临床获得专科技术质量反馈,为制订VSD护理方案提供参考依据。Objective To develop a standard,reasonable and applicable vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technology assessment system. Methods The VSD technology assessment system was developed through literature review,filed investigation and two rounds of expert consultation. Results The expert authoritative coefficient was 0.925; the judgment eoeffieient and familiar coefficient was 0.905 and 0.945,respectively. The VSD technology assessment system included 4 first-level indicators and 27 seeond-level indicators. The coordination coefficient in first-level and second- level indieators was 0.503 and 0.422,respectively. Conclusion The VSD technology assessment system can be used to standardize and guide the quality control of VCD eare and make scientific quality control decisions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222