检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学法学院.知识产权学院,湖南湘潭411105
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2015年第6期81-93,共13页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX2013B247)
摘 要:高价值基因专利权人利益与人类生命健康权益的冲突、美国专利制度对科研豁免规定的严格条件、美国专利法对专利权客体所持的开放、包容态度,这既是Myriad Genetics案发生的根源所在,也传达了基因技术与专利制度的互动诉求。美国联邦最高法院作出的关于分离的DNA序列不具备可专利性的回应只是暂时平息基因专利争议的权宜之计,远未实现基因技术与专利制度的良性互动。通过适度放宽科研豁免条件、限缩基因类专利的客体范围,以平衡基因技术专利权人利益与人类生命健康权益,推动基因专利制度的优化趋势。The conflict between the high-value gene patents and the human life and health rights, the very strin- gent conditions of the research exemption of the US Patent Regime, the open-mind attitude on the subject matter of the U.S. Patent Regime, which is the root of Myriad Genetics case, but also revealed the interactive demand of gene technology and US Patent Regime. However, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the patent claims of the isolated DNA was invalid which can only temporarily quell the "Controversial" situation of the Patent Regime due to the gene technology, far from achieving benign interaction between gene technology and the Patent Regime. Through appropriate relaxation of the research exemption condition, limit the patentable subject matter of gene technology, in order to balance the interests of gene patentees and the people' human life and health rights, promote the optimization and trend of Patent Regime on gene technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222