检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓菊 胡雁[3] 薛嵋 戴宏琴[1,2] 李全磊 陆箴琦[1,2]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属肿瘤医院护理部 [2]复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系,上海200032 [3]复旦大学护理学院,上海200032
出 处:《护士进修杂志》2015年第11期994-998,共5页Journal of Nurses Training
基 金:复旦大学护理科研基金重点项目(编号:FNF201012)
摘 要:目的对国内外探讨中心静脉导管头端最佳位置影像学标识的研究进行系统评价,分析并评鉴文献中报道的中心静脉导管头端最佳位置影像学标识的实施内容、可行性及其效果。方法运用循证护理的方法学,制订PECOD原则,检索Cochrane图书馆、JBI循证卫生保健国际合作中心图书馆、EMbase、Elsevier、Web of knowledge、Ovid、CBM、CNKI和万方数据库中关于中心静脉导管头端最佳位置影像学标识的队列研究、病例对照研究及描述性研究。结果共纳入描述性研究文献4篇,对纳入研究进行描述性分析,气管隆凸下4cm或2个胸椎椎体单元是较理想的影像学判断标识。结论目前X线胸片仍是确定中心静脉导管头端位置的首要方法,其影像学判断标识显得尤为重要。Objective To evaluate the domestic and overseas studies exploring the imaging marks used to position the central venous catheters (CVCs) tip location ,and to analyze and assess the reported implementation ,feasibility and effect of the imaging identifications of catheter tips .Method Evidence‐based nursing methodology was used to establish PICOD prin‐ciple .Cohort study ,case‐control study and descriptive study about imaging marks of CVCs tip location were searched in Cochrane Library ,JBI Library ,EMbase ,Elsevier ,Web of Knowledge ,Ovid ,CBM ,CNKI and Wanfang Data .Quality of studies was evaluated and data were extracted by two researchers .Result Four descriptive studies were included .Descriptive analysis was conducted .The most reliable estimate of CVCs tip location was a point of 4cm or two vertebral body units be‐low the carina .Conclusion At present ,chest X‐ray is still the first choice used to identify the tip location of CVCs .And the imaging marks of catheter tips are particularly important .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7