检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南国土资源职业学院数字国土与土地管理学院,云南昆明650217 [2]昆明理工大学国土资源工程学院,云南昆明650093
出 处:《云南地理环境研究》2015年第1期65-72,共8页Yunnan Geographic Environment Research
基 金:云南省思茅区地质灾害调查与区划项目
摘 要:在对思茅区地质灾害进行详细调查的基础上,采用信息量法和模糊综合评判法分别对地质灾害进行危险性分区评价,并对两种评价结果进行了对比和综合分析。研究表明:在大部分地区两种评价结果一致且与实地调查结果吻合度高;地质灾害高度危险区主要分布在山区居民集中的沟谷山坡地带以及交通相对便利的公路沿线地区,低度危险区主要分布在地势相对平坦的盆地一带以及自然保护区;在局部地区,信息量法评价结果相对模糊综合评判结果与实地调查结果的吻合度更高。Based on detailed investigation of geological hazards in Simao District, the geological hazards risk as- sessment was carded out using information model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, then, two evaluation results are compared with each other on figures and lists. Studies had indicated that the information model evaluation results was consistent with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results in most of the region, which had a high degree of agreement with the results of field survey ; and the high - risk zone of geological hazard mainly distribute in the mountain valley hillside where hillmen resident in, as well as the relevant convenient transport ar- eas along the highway ; the low - risk zone of geological hazard mainly concentrate on the basin where the terrain is relatively flat and Nature Reserve; and there is a higher matching degree between the information model evaluation results and the actual investigation results than fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results in the local area.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222