沉思反应问卷中文版在大学生中的信效度检验  

The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Ruminative Response Scale(RRS) in Undergraduates

作　　者：戴琴[1,2] 冯正直[1] 许爽[1] 谢均润 刘可愚[1] 于永菊[1] 王晓霞[1] 张睿[1] 贺英[1] 李嘉雯[1] 李静[1] 刘云波[1] 刘秀娜[2] 张翠华[2] 王立菲[1] 杨晓霞[2] 高秋平[2] 韩在玲 

机构地区：[1]第三军医大学心理系 [2]第三军医大学护理系,400038

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2015年第5期753-758,共6页China Journal of Health Psychology

基　　金：国家自然基金资助(NSFC:31200774)

摘　　要：目的：沉思被认为是情绪障碍的典型特点,沉思反应问卷（RRS）是国际上应用广泛的测量个体沉思水平的问卷,具有良好的信效度,本文引进RRS以为国内研究同行及临床医生提供一个便捷可靠的沉思评价工具。方法：本文作者把英文版RRS翻译成中文,并对1450个中国大学生施测,对结果进行信效度分析。结果：中文版RRS及因子内部一致性α信度系数在0.736～0.934,分半信度在0.763～0.896,而重测信度在0.501～0.581,问卷各条目与量表总分之间的相关系数在0.22～0.79,分问卷与总问卷之间的相关为0.86～0.96,分问卷之间相关系数在0.73～0.79。调查数据显示中文版RRS没有性别差异（P〉0.05）,但存在年龄差异,随着年龄的增长,RRS问卷的抑郁（F=50.766,P〈0.001）、强迫冥想（F=35.075,P〈0.001）、反思（F=29.587,P〈0.001）以及RRS总分（F=49.026,P〈0.001）显著增加。RRS各条目与BDI-II、PHQ总分之间的相关系数在0.21～0.49（除了条目12）,抑郁、强迫冥想、反思分问卷、RRS总分与BDI-II、PHQ总分之间的相关系数在0.37～0.54。RRS总分与BDI-II、PHQ总分相关系数分别为0.52和0.51。结论：说明中文版RRS问卷在中国大学生群体中具有良好的信效度,年龄较大者沉思得分较高,RRS与抑郁呈中度相关。Objective：Rumination was believed a traditional trait in mood disorder.The ruminative response scale（RRS） was one of most used self-reporting inventory for measuring the severity of rumination symptoms in the whole world,which was indicated with good reliability and validity.Present study introduced the RRS to offer a convenient and reliable tool of measuring the cognitive bias for national researchers and clinical doctors.Methods：Present study translated the English-version RRS into Chinese,and 1450 Chinese undergraduates were surveyed with the translated version,the reliability and validity were analyzed based on the survey.Results：It was found that the Cronbach＇α coefficients were between0.736 and 0.934,the split-half coefficients were between 0.763 and 0.896,and the retest reliability were 0.501 ～ 0.581,the correlation coefficients between sub-scale were 0.73 ～ 0.79,the correlation coefficients between each item and whole scale were 0.22 ～ 0.79,the correlation coefficients between sub-scale and whole scale were 0.86 ～ 0.96.Investigation showed no gender difference（P 〉0.05） but age difference on the scores of RRS,with higher scores on depression（F = 50.766,P〈0.001）,brood（F =35.075,P〈0.001）,reflection（F = 29.587,P〈0.001）,and total score（F = 49.026,P〈0.001） of RRS in elder individuals.The correlation coefficients between each item of RRS and BDI-II,PHQ were0.21 ～ 0.49（except item 12）,the correlation coefficients between RRS and BDI,PHQ were 0.37 ～0.54.The correlation coefficients between the total scores of RRS and total scores of BDI-II and PHQ were 0.52 and 0.51,respectively.Conclusion：Chinese RRS has good reliability and validity,elder individuals have higher RRS scores,and there is moderate correlation between RRS and depression.

关 键 词：沉思反应问卷 信度 效度 大学生 

分 类 号：R395.9[哲学宗教—心理学]