检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院肿瘤一病房,成都610041
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床与康复》2015年第6期719-721,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
摘 要:目的探讨系统化护理干预措施对肺癌患者癌因性疲乏(CRF)的临床效果。方法将80例肺癌CFR患者采用随机数字表法均分为对照组和观察组,对照组患者采用常规护理,观察组患者采用系统化护理,采用疲乏量表与癌症患者生活质量测定表检测患者癌因性疲乏和生活质量,观察护理效果。结果观察组早期患者全部治愈,中晚期患者死亡3例,疗效显著性高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组治疗后无疲乏例数高达19例,重度疲乏3例,显著性好于对照组(P<0.05);生活质量评分,观察组相比于对照组显著性较高(P<0.05)。结论系统化护理可明显改善肺癌CFR患者治疗效果和疲乏度,提高生活质量。Objective To discuss the clinical effect of systematic nursing intervention on the lung cancer patients with cancer related fatigue (CFR). Methods 80 lung cancer patients with CFR were ran- domly divided into control group and nursing group, which were nursed by usual care, nursing intervention, respectively. Piper fatigue scale and living quality scale of cancer patients were applied to detect the CFR and living quality in 2 groups, Observed the clinical effects in 2 groups. Results All the early stage pa- tients in nursing group were cured, and only 3 middle and advanced stage patients died, which indicated a better curative effect compared with control group ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; Numbers of no-fatigue patients in nursing group were 19 and serious fatigue patients were 3, which was significantly better than the control group (P 〈 0. 05 ) ; Living quality scale of nursing group was clearly higher than control group( P 〈 0.05 ). Con- clusions Systematic nursing intervention could clearly improve clinical effect and static fatigue of lung cancer patients with CFR, increase the living quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117