检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔阳[1] 范晓周 赵艳红[1] 李宏艳[1] 张桂香[1] 何秋生[1]
机构地区:[1]太原科技大学环境与安全学院,山西太原030024 [2]山西省环境监测中心站,山西太原030027
出 处:《山西科技》2015年第3期43-45,49,共4页Shanxi Science and Technology
基 金:山西省青年科技研究基金(2011021025-2);山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目(2011080);太原科技大学校青年基金项目(20103017)
摘 要:为了解不同净化方法对植物样品中PAHs的回收率及可靠性,以硅胶氧化铝层析柱净化法和SAX/PSA-SPE柱净化法分别进行了净化实验。结果表明,两种方法对杂质的去除效果均较好,只是硅胶氧化铝层析柱净化法得到的植物样品中∑16-PAHs浓度比SAX/PSA-SPE柱净化法高8.69%~22.45%,但SAX/PSA-SPE柱法操作较为简便快捷,而硅胶氧化铝层析柱法较为经济适用。In order to understand the recovery rates of PAHs in plant samples and reliability of different purifying methods, this paper carries out the purification experiments by using silica gel alumina chromatography column purifying method and SAX/PSA-SPE column purifying method respectively. The results show that the impurity removal effects of both the two methods are better, merely the concentration of ∑ 16-PAHs in plant samples obtained by using silica gel alumina chromatography column purifying method is higher than that obtained by using SAX/PSA-SPE column purifying method by 8.69%-22.45%, but the operation of SAX/PSA-SPE column purifying method is more simple and quicker, and the silica gel alumina chromatography column purifying method is more economic and more applicable.
分 类 号:X83[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.172.7