美国联邦巡回上诉法院的演进及启示——兼谈我国知识产权审判体制改革的方向  

The Evolution of the U.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and its Revelation

作　　者：曹博[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400045

出　　处：《法学杂志》2015年第6期121-131,共11页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"反不正当竞争中的商业标识保护问题研究"(项目号:14BFX103);国家社科基金青年项目"专利保险制度研究"(项目号:14CFX037)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：虽然我国已在北京、上海、广州正式设立了知识产权法院,但知识产权审判体制改革仍需进一步深化。在国际层面上,美国联邦巡回上诉法院属于较有特点的一种知识产权法院模式。通过对其设立动因、组织架构、实际效用及引发的争议进行深入考察,结合美国的政治结构、经济形势、司法传统,可以较为客观地认识美国联邦巡回上诉法院发挥的作用。我国知识产权制度赖以发展的制度环境与美国不同,但美国联邦巡回上诉法院在关国专利保护中发挥的作用以及演进轨迹,能够为我国知识产权法院在知识产权保护中发挥的功效提供更为理性的认识,进而为知识产权审判体制的进一步变革提供有益的启示。Intellectual property court has been established in Beijing, Guangzbou and Shanghai, but the judicial system reform of intellectual property rights will be deepened in the future. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit （CAFC） belongs to a characteristic mode of intellectual property court at the international level. Through a thorough investigation for the establishment of motivation, the organization structure, the actual utility and controversy of CAFC, combined with the American political structure, economic situation and judicial tradition, we can obtain more objective understanding for CAFC. On the basis of understanding the systematic environment which intellectual property rights depending for survive in China, by the comparison of CAFC＇ s role in patent protection in U. S. , it could be able to get more rational understanding of the efficacy for China＇ s intellectual property rights court in the protection of intellectual property in China, and it will provide some positive revelations for the judicial system reform of intellectual property rights in China.

关 键 词：美国联邦巡回上诉法院 专利 知识产权法院 知识产权审判体制 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学] D923.4