商业秘密刑民交叉案件处理模式的困境及其破解  

The Problems and Solutions of Trade Secrets Overlapping Criminal and Civil Cases' Processing Mode

作　　者：黄亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《时代法学》2015年第3期107-114,共8页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"3D打印知识产权法律问题研究"(项目编号:14BFX087);赢创德固赛(中国)投资有限公司赢创知识产权研究基金项目成果之一

摘　　要：商业秘密刑民交叉案件是一类比较特殊的知识产权案件。我国法院恪守"先刑后民"原则处理此类案件会遭遇诸多困境,主要表现为刑民级别管辖错位、刑民裁判相互冲突、刑民证据制度迥异、刑事滥诉风险增加。在处理商业秘密刑民交叉案件过程中,"先刑后民"存在诸多劣势,"先民后刑"反而独具优势。可通过遵循先民后刑的处理原则、确立刑民统一的审级制度、采用三审合一的审判模式、设立并完善知识产权法院,来破解商业秘密刑民交叉案件的处理困境,实现商业秘密权利人和侵权人利益的平衡。Trade secrets overlapping criminal and civil cases is a kind of special intellectual property cases. The court of our country handle such cases will encounter many difficulties when it abides by the principle of criminal prior to civil. Mainly for the criminal and civil jurisdiction level dislocation, the criminal and civil judgment conflicting, the criminal and civil evidence system are different, the risk of criminal litigation abuse increased. The principle of criminal prior to civil has many disadvantages while the principle of civil prior to criminal has many advantages in the process of handling trade secrets overlapping criminal and civil cases. Through obeying the handle principle of civil prior to criminal, establishing criminal and civil uniform judicial hierarchy, adopting the trial mode of three-in-one, establishing and perfecting the intellectual property court; In order to solve the problem of handling trade secrets overlapping criminal and civil cases, and balance the interests of trade secrets holder and infringer.

关 键 词：商业秘密 刑民交叉 先民后刑 三审合一 知识产权法院 

分 类 号：DF523.9[政治法律—民商法学]