检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王东伟[1]
出 处:《时代法学》2015年第3期115-120,F0003,共7页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》修正案对规范性文件的法院审查进行了修改。法院可以对其进行附带审查,是这次行政诉讼法修改的一大亮点。虽然在是否可以提起诉讼的方面有了实质的突破,但是在审理结果的规定上存在与现行法不衔接、违反诉判关系一致原理等问题。所以,对规范性文件的审查应当在程序设计上进行突破,比如被告的确定、审理过程以及审理结果等都需要与规范性文件审查之诉相适应。The amendment of "Administrative litigation law of the people's Republic of China" has ruled that the court may carry on the incidental review of the normative documents. This is a major bright spot to modify the administrative litigation law. Although it is a substantial breakthrough that whether can file a lawsuit on the normative documents, there still are many problems. For example, the provisions on the trial results can't link up with the current law, and violate the relation- ship between litigation and judgment. So there must be program design to review the normative documents. For example, it must be coherent with the action of reviewing the normative documents that the definition of the defendant, the trial process and the outcome.
分 类 号:DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15