驾驶员人格对危险知觉的影响  

Effect of Personality Traits on Drivers' Hazard Perception

作　　者：赵光珍[1] 王太海[1] 郭双[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海洋大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2015年第6期871-873,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年项目(编号:L13CSH018)

摘　　要：目的:探索驾驶员人格对危险知觉的影响。方法:采用大五人格量表和驾驶员危险知觉情境问卷对大连市120名驾驶员进行测量。结果:1危险识别、危险预测和危险反应的驾龄和年龄主效应差异显著(F=26.141,18.074,21.337,6.701,9.933,15.545;P<0.01);2神经质与危险知觉3个维度得分均呈负相关(r=-0.211^-0.321,P<0.01)。责任心与危险知觉3个维度均呈正相关(r=0.180~0.264,P<0.05)。宜人性与危险识别和危险反应呈正相关(r=0.216,0.382;P<0.01);3回归分析发现:驾龄、年龄、神经质、责任心和宜人性可以解释驾驶员危险知觉31.8%的变异。结论:驾驶员年龄越大,驾龄越长,危险知觉越好。神经质、责任心和宜人性可以有效地预测不同驾驶员的危险知觉能力。Objective： To explore the effect of personality traits on drivers＇ hazard perception ability.Methods： 120 drivers were measured by using Big Five Personality Inventory and Situational Questionnaire of Driver Hazard Perception. Results： 1 The main effect of age and driving experience were significant for hazard detection,hazard anticipation and reaction to hazards（ F = 26. 141,18. 074,21. 337,6. 701,9. 933,15. 545; P〈0. 01）. 2 Neuroticism negatively correlated with the three dimensions（ r =-0. 211 ^-0. 321,P〈0. 01）,while conscientiousness positively correlated with the three dimensions（ r= 0. 180 ~ 0. 264; P〈0. 05）. Agreeableness correlated positively with hazard detection and reaction the hazard（ r = 0. 216,0. 382; P〈0. 01）. 3 Regression analysis revealed that the effects of age,driving experience and personality traits could explain 31. 8% variation of hazard perception. Conclusion： Drivers＇ hazard perception ability will be better if they have more driving experience. Neuroticism,conscientiousness and agreeableness can predict drivers＇ hazard perception well.

关 键 词：驾驶员 人格 危险知觉 危险识别 危险预测 

分 类 号：R395.9[哲学宗教—心理学]